<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Will a GTO Trainer Make Me the Next Poker Legend?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.pokertraining.com/poker/blog/will-a-gto-trainer-make-me-the-next-poker-legend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.pokertraining.com/poker/blog/will-a-gto-trainer-make-me-the-next-poker-legend/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: KEITH BRANDT		</title>
		<link>https://www.pokertraining.com/poker/blog/will-a-gto-trainer-make-me-the-next-poker-legend/#comment-134634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KEITH BRANDT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.advancedpokertraining.com/poker/blog/?p=4086#comment-134634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a great blog! I see way too many people use terms like, &quot;supposed to&quot; when they talk about decisions in hold&#039;em. They&#039;re referring to what the solver would do. But the supercomputer processor behind the solver devised that strategy from playing billions of hands against another supercomputer processor. It&#039;s unrealistic to go that deep against human opponents - even high stakes pros. 
Instead use a solver build a theoretical, technical foundation to your game. Then test your knowledge against APT&#039;s human-like bots. If a spot confuses you, you can always examine it in the solver to expand your theoretical knowledge base. Then compare it to what your favorite APT advisor recommends.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great blog! I see way too many people use terms like, &#8220;supposed to&#8221; when they talk about decisions in hold&#8217;em. They&#8217;re referring to what the solver would do. But the supercomputer processor behind the solver devised that strategy from playing billions of hands against another supercomputer processor. It&#8217;s unrealistic to go that deep against human opponents &#8211; even high stakes pros.<br />
Instead use a solver build a theoretical, technical foundation to your game. Then test your knowledge against APT&#8217;s human-like bots. If a spot confuses you, you can always examine it in the solver to expand your theoretical knowledge base. Then compare it to what your favorite APT advisor recommends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
